你想知道的赛斯和珍的一点秘密

此段摘自《灵魂永生》

第二十章  问答篇

你是否同意说，这些赛斯课是对珍和我所做的，提升到了有意识层面的说法者培训？

你曾告诉我们，你将详述你在透过珍对满屋子人说话时所感知到的东西。在那节ESP课里，你谈到自己进入出神状态，以及你要在我们的时空里准确找到我们所需的努力。

   你能不能说说，在赛斯课开始前你接触珍的一些方法？

一个我几乎毫不犹豫写下的问题：“当你不通过珍说话时，你有兴趣感知我们的日常生活吗？这可能吗？

（“We’ll call this eleven-a: Wouldn’t you say then that these sessions are Speaker training for Jane and me, raised to a conscious level? ”）

They are indeed. The inner information must be consciously recognized. In your terms, by the time an individual is in his last physical life, all portions of the personality are then familial with it at the time of death. The personality is not swept willy-nilly back to another earthly existence, as might be the case otherwise.

The conscious physically oriented portions of the self become acquainted with the inner information. To some extent the reality of thought is consciously perceived as the innovator behind physical matter. Such an individual then can understand the nature of hallucinations at the point of death, and with full conscious awareness enter into the next plane of existence. The information made conscious is then passed on to others where it can be physically recognized and applied.

Now, as to the next question.

（“Number nine: You told us you were going to elaborate upon what you perceive when you are speaking through Jane to a roomful of people. In that ESP class session, you mentioned going into a trance yourself, and the effort required by you to pinpoint us in our time and space. ”）

I perceive people in a room in a far different manner than they perceive themselves; their various past and future reincarnated personalities, but not their probable selves, are perceivable to me.

I “see” the reincarnated aspects, the various manifestations taken in that regard. In your terms it would be as if you saw a series of quickly moving pictures, all representing various poses of one personality. I must remember, in all communications with those in the room, to limit my remarks and focus to the specific reincarnated “present self.”

I see this composite image myself. It is not registered by Ruburt’s eyes, which do not have the multidimensional depth perception necessary. I see the composite image clearly, whether or not I am looking through Ruburt’s eyes. I use his eyes because they narrow down the focus for me, to the one “present” self of which the individual is aware.

Communicating with your system in such a manner demands great diligence and greater discrimination, according to the “distance” of the communicator from the physical system. I am not based within the physical system, for example. The discrimination comes to bear upon the precision needed to enter your reality at the precise time, the precise point in time and space, upon which you are concentrated.

Present and future experience of those in the room are available to me, and as real as their present experience. Therefore I must remember what they think has already happened, or not yet occurred, for to me it is one. These patterns of activity, however, are also constantly changing. I say for example that I am aware of their past and future actions and thoughts; and yet what I am aware of. actually, are ever-shifting and changing patterns, both in the future and in the past.

Some of the events that I see connected very clearly with these persons in the future may not, in your physical system, occur. They exist as probabilities, as potentials, actualized in thoughts but not turned into definite physical form. I told you that no events were predetermined. I would have to time into a future date, in your terms, and probe it with all of its ramifications in order to ascertain which of the probable actions I saw in your earlier would be actualized in your later.

To a large extent the methods of communication may vary. A personality based within physical reality, between lives for example, would find entry in many ways easier. The information he would be able to give, however, would also be limited because of his experience. I do have a memory of physical existence however, and this automatically helps me in translating your mental data into physical form. I do perceive objects, for example. Using Ruburt’s mechanism is of great help here also. At times I see the room and the people as he, or rather his perceptive mechanisms, do.

In this case I translate or read that data and use it as you might a computer’s. Will that answer your question?

（“Excellent. ”）

I am ready for the next.

（“Number ten: Are you going to tell us about some of the ways you contacted Jane before these sessions began? ”）

I mentioned some of that in an earlier chapter. Much of her training, as Jane, took place in the dream state. There were frequent out-of-body projections in which she attended classes, taught initially by various Speakers. The information gained was often brought to conscious layers through the poetry.

There was concentrated training that allowed her to focus inward; an exterior environment that forced her to look inward for answers, and a strong religious structure in which initial growth could take place. That is enough.

（A long pause while I scanned the next three questions: twelve, thirteen, and fourteen.）

If this is the reincarnational material, let that go for now.

（It was. I skipped down to number nineteen, a question I almost hadn’t bothered to write down. “Do you have any interest in perceiving our daily lives when you’re not speaking through Jane? Is this possible? ”）

I do not make it a practice to observe. We are connected, however, in our psychological gestalt, and so I am aware of any intense feelings on your part, or strong reactions of any kind. This does not mean that I am necessarily aware of all events within your lives, or that I always break down the feelings I receive from you into specifics.

 I am generally aware, therefore, of your condition. If anything upsets Ruburt. he automatically sends me messages about it. I am aware, within the limitations mentioned, of future events in your lives. I am much more concerned with your overall spiritual vitality than I am with what you had for breakfast.

I think that will do for that one.

《赛斯说●第180期》

?  “赛斯说” （ ）

?  “ ”

? ( ) ，群共享里有免费赛斯资料中英文版下载， 交流学习。

长按以下二维码为我们打赏哦！